Nature-based solutions to China’s development challenges
Overview
While China’s remarkable industrial development has lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty and created a large middle class, it has also caused significant biodiversity loss, ecosystem degradation, and pollution in urban and rural areas. These environmental crises threaten human health and safety and undermine long-term economic development.
In response, China’s government is now promoting a system of ecological civilization to align environmental conservation and socio-economic development through initiatives in natural capital investment, sustainable infrastructure, biodiversity protection and renewable energy. Notably, China has committed to establishing official protection over 30% of its land by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060.
SCCEI is collaborating with the Stanford Natural Capital Project (NatCap) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (RCEES) to advance nature-based policy solutions and support sustainable development in China and around the world. Our research focuses on four key areas: Ecological Civilization, Gross Ecosystem Product, Urban Nature and Health, and Nature and Rural Vitalization.
OUR COLLABORATORS:
Image
Featured Projects
Ecological Civilization
Ecological Civilization, a new policy system in China, is designed to align environmental conservation with socio-economic development. Our research analyzes this emerging policy framework and identifies opportunities for collaboration with government, enterprises, and civil society.
Gross Ecosystem Product
Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) is an index that aggregates the total value of ecosystem goods and services into a single monetary metric. Co-developed by NatCap and RCEES, GEP is now being piloted in China on local and national levels.
Urban Nature and Health
With over 1 billion people projected to live in China’s cities by 2030, the mental and physical health of the urban population has become a top priority. Our research identifies how nature solutions can improve public health outcomes, with a focus on the role of urban greenspace.
Nature and Rural Vitalization
China’s rural countryside faces increasing needs for both environmental and economic investment. Our research aims to coordinate investments in natural capital with investments in human capital to transform China’s countryside into a frontier of sustainable development.
Global Ecology and Conservation,
September 26, 2019
Over 240 migratory water bird species depend on China's 18,000 km coastline as a vital stopover area. However, the rapid loss of natural wetlands has threatened this seasonal water bird migration over the last few decades. In the present study, to improve our understanding of the pattern and amount of habitat loss in key stopover areas (KSAs) and the spatial covariance between habitat loss and economic development, we conducted a spatially explicit evaluation of coastal habitat loss in KSAs and explored its relationship with social and economic dynamics along the China coast by integrating high-spatial resolution satellite imagery with an updated coastal water bird investigation data set. The remote sensing survey detected a habitat loss percentage of 19.4% in the KSAs during 2000 and 2010. Aquaculture, urbanization, and land reclamation were responsible for the most severe disturbances to coastal habitats. These results demonstrate that the losses of wetland habitats in the KSAs in Chinese coastal areas are more severe than those in other coastal areas even though more protective measures have been implemented in these areas. Risk-based analysis showed that the risk of habitat loss was greatest in undeveloped regions with rich natural wetland and large populations, thereby demonstrating the critical importance of shifting the focus of water bird conservation to these regions to ensure the conservation of migratory water birds in the East Asian–Australasian Flyway. These findings disagree with the hypothesis that more habitats are lost when the economy is more developed. Therefore, we suggest that focusing conservation decisions on areas undergoing urbanization might improve the effectiveness of conservation measures given the pressures due to various forms of wetland exploitation.
A growing body of empirical evidence is revealing the value of nature experience for mental health. With rapid urbanization and declines in human contact with nature globally, crucial decisions must be made about how to preserve and enhance opportunities for nature experience. Here, we first provide points of consensus across the natural, social, and health sciences on the impacts of nature experience on cognitive functioning, emotional well-being, and other dimensions of mental health. We then show how ecosystem service assessments can be expanded to include mental health, and provide a heuristic, conceptual model for doing so.
